nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 05, v.28 137-146
针灸度量制混乱现象调查与标准化可行性
基金项目(Foundation): 国家中医药管理局第五批全国中医临床优秀人才研修项目(国中医药人教函[2022]1号); 辽宁省特聘教授项目(辽教发[2015]153号)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13194/j.issn.1673-842X.2026.05.021
投稿时间: 2025-09-18
投稿日期(年): 2025
修回时间: 2025-12-24
终审时间: 2025-12-24
终审日期(年): 2025
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2026-01-04
出版时间: 2026-01-04
网络发布时间: 2026-01-04
移动端阅读
摘要:

为了了解针灸专业人员对针灸度量制的理解和临床使用情况,该研究基于问卷星平台采取线上问卷调查的形式,对针灸医生、教师及学生等几组相关人员进行问卷调查,以探讨针灸度量制标准化路径、方法和可行性。研究采用分位数法进行数据清洗,并对相关数据进行统计分析。调查最终共收集了789份有效问卷,结果显示仅有39%的教师有在课堂上讲述和57%的学生在课堂上学习古今针灸度量制的演变,34.98%的人误认为各国都使用世界针灸学会联合会的“标准化”寸来规定针具的“寸长”,93.54%的人只能接受针灸度量的误差小于10%,只有43.6%的人选择根据针的长度及留在皮肤外针体的长度来判断刺入皮肤内深度,54.88%的人认为文献及教科书的“穴位针刺深度”是指患者的同身寸,只有17.87%的人选择《内经》中的1寸=23.1 mm,38.78%的人选择七尺五寸的准确身高是173.25 cm,15.21%的人选择同身寸最早见于唐代,70.34%的调查者认为针灸度量制及针具长度需要有统一的标准。研究结果表明目前针灸医生、教师及学生对针刺安全要求、针灸度量制及针具长度建立国际标准的必要性有统一的认识,但对于针灸度量制其他问题的认知混乱。因此,有必要从针灸度量制的起源把针灸寸制厘清,将相关的概念纳入教科书、继续教育及各种国际标准中,同时恢复以汉寸为基准的标身寸,促进相关人员系统学习,积极推动针灸度量制标准化,促进行业规范化发展。

Abstract:

To understand the understanding and clinical application of acupuncture measurement system among acupuncture professionals,this study conducted an online questionnaire survey via the Wenjuanxing platform,targeting relevant groups including acupuncturists,teachers,and students,so as to explore the paths,methods,and feasibility of standardizing acupuncture measurement system. The study employed the quantile method for data cleaning and performed statistical analysis on the relevant data. The survey ultimately yielded 789 valid questionnaires. The results showed that only 39% of teachers taught the evolution of the ancient and modern acupuncture measurement system in class,and 57% of students learned this content in class. 34.98% of respondents mistakenly believed that all countries use the “standardized” Cun of the World Federation of Acupuncture-Moxibustion Societies(WFAS)to specify the “Cun length” of acupuncture needles. 93.54% of respondents could only accept an error of less than 10% in acupuncture measurement. Only 43.6% of respondents judged the depth of acupuncture needle insertion into the skin based on the acupuncture needle length and the length of the needle body remaining outside the skin. 54.88% of respondents believed that the “acupoint insertion depth” mentioned in literatures and textbooks refers to the patient's proportional body Cun. Only 17.87% of respondents chose 1 Cun=23.1 mm as stated in Inner Canon of the Yellow Emperor. 38.78% of respondents selected 173.25 cm as the accurate height corresponding to seven Chi and five Cun. 15.21% of respondents chose proportional body Cun that was first recorded in the Tang Dynasty. 70.34% of respondents believed that unified standards for acupuncture measurement system and acupuncture needle length are necessary. The results of this study indicated that acupuncturists,teachers,and students currently hold a unified understanding regarding the necessity of establishing international standards for acupuncture safety requirements,acupuncture measurement systems,and needle lengths. However,their perceptions of other issues related to acupuncture measurement systems remain inconsistent. Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the cun measurement of acupuncture starting from the origin of acupuncture measurement system,incorporate relevant concepts into textbooks,continuing education programs,and various international standards,and restore standard body Cun based on the Han Cun. This will promote systematic learning among relevant personnel,actively advance the standardization of acupuncture measurement system,and facilitate the standardized development of the industry.

参考文献

[1]武晓冬,袁静云,赵楠琦,等.国内外针灸临床实践指南的现状调查与内容分析[J].中国针灸,2021,41(8):923-927,932.

[2]李永明.针灸度量寸制的起源、混乱现状及标准化建议[J].中华中医药学刊,2023,41(10):19-23,261.

[3]王迦琳,李永明,任路,等.针刺安全深度与针具标准化[J].中华中医药学刊,2025,43(10):202-207.

[4]李永明.西汉人体陶俑的医学研究[J].中华中医药学刊,2024,42(6):20-28.

[5]黄龙祥.中国针灸学术史大纲[M].北京:华夏出版社,2001.

[6]梁繁荣,王华.针灸学[M]. 5版.北京:中国中医药出版社,2021.

[7]胡锦波,黄静,王顺梅,等.基于磁共振成像的气海俞穴针刺深度研究[J].大理大学学报,2021,6(2):72-75.

[8]严振国,白娟,邵水金,等.危险穴位针刺深度与角度的研究[J].中国针灸,2004,24(11):769-772.

[9]严振国,张建华,顾洪川,等.头颈部“危险穴位”针刺安全深度的研究[J].上海针灸杂志,1996,15(S1):37-38.

[10]杨松堤,李亚东,姜国华,等.应用CT测量风府针刺深度的研究[J].中国针灸,2008,28(1):47-48.

[11]苏妆.《黄帝内经》腧穴理论的发生学研究[D].沈阳:辽宁中医药大学,2013.

[12]All China Zhenjiu(Acupuncture and Moxibustion)Society.关于针灸穴名国际化方案[J].中国针灸,1982,2(6):1-8.

[13]赵璟,张树剑.基于科学文献计量的国内针灸标准化研究进展与趋势分析[J].标准科学,2025(5):46-54.

[14]齐兰,易文军.国家标准针灸技术操作规范正式实施[J].中国针灸,2008,28(8):610.

[15]景向红,朱兵.针灸学科当前的机遇与挑战[J].科技导报,2019,37(15):9-14.

[16]武晓冬,刘保延.我国针灸标准化的现状及面临的挑战与对策[J].中国针灸,2019,39(4):343-348.

[17]高卫芳,袁馨如,马唯刚,等.近二十年中医技术操作规范的研究现状、问题及对策分析[J].天津中医药大学学报,2024,43(9):834-842.

[18]宋晓溪.《针灸甲乙经》的文献研究[D].北京:中国中医科学院,2016.

[19]李丹萍.针灸学教材刺法研究[D].南京:南京中医药大学,2021.

[20]刘炜宏.我国针灸标准及标准化的现状与思考[J].中国针灸,2009,29(1):40-43.

[21]陈泽林,赵雪,郭扬,等.中医针灸标准化关键问题研究[J].世界中医药,2020,15(7):990-996.

[22]潘琳钐,彭拥军.基于古今针灸标准化差异探讨针灸安全性的发展史[J].针灸临床杂志,2022,38(9):1-5.

[23]荣培晶,陈瑜,王瑜,等.面向未来的中国医学——针灸篇[J].世界科学技术-中医药现代化,2021,23(8):2884-2888.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13194/j.issn.1673-842X.2026.05.021

中图分类号:R245

引用信息:

[1]李洪博,张松兴,李永明,等.针灸度量制混乱现象调查与标准化可行性[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2026,28(05):137-146.DOI:10.13194/j.issn.1673-842X.2026.05.021.

基金信息:

国家中医药管理局第五批全国中医临床优秀人才研修项目(国中医药人教函[2022]1号); 辽宁省特聘教授项目(辽教发[2015]153号)

投稿时间:

2025-09-18

投稿日期(年):

2025

修回时间:

2025-12-24

终审时间:

2025-12-24

终审日期(年):

2025

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2026-01-04

出版时间:

2026-01-04

网络发布时间:

2026-01-04

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文